The Cost of Clarity: Why Great Product Leaders Embrace Vulnerability

The Cost of Clarity: Why Great Product Leaders Embrace Vulnerability
Photo by T D / Unsplash

Most people think clarity is a skill—the ability to simplify the complex, to chart a direction others can follow. But the longer I’ve led teams, the more I’ve realized clarity is an act of courage. Because to be clear means exposing what you believe. It means saying: this is the path forward—even when you know it might not be perfect.

In game development and other creative industries, clarity doesn’t come from control—it comes from alignment through uncertainty. We talk about clarity constantly: clarity of vision, clarity of roadmap, clarity of priorities. But clarity doesn’t come from certainty—it comes from conviction. It’s not about knowing everything. It’s about trusting yourself enough to stand still while the ground shifts beneath you.

I wrote about this tension in Product Success = Clarity, Not Just Shipping—how clarity isn’t about volume of work, but shared understanding of impact. That same principle applies to leadership.


The Paradox of Clarity

Early in my career, I thought leadership meant always sounding sure. I believed teams needed confidence from me, not honesty. If I wavered, I worried it would look like I didn’t know what I was doing.

But the truth is, teams don’t trust perfection—they trust transparency. Over time, I learned that the fastest way to erode credibility isn’t being wrong; it’s pretending you’re right when everyone can feel the doubt in the room.

The longer you lead, the more people expect you to have the answers. But no one ever does—not fully. What changes is experience: you start recognizing patterns, asking better questions, and trusting your judgment to find the path forward. That’s the quiet confidence that clarity is built on.

It’s also terrifying, in a way. The higher you rise, the more trust people place in you—and the more visible every mistake becomes. Leadership isn’t just responsibility; it’s exposure. I’ve made calls that didn’t land, handled situations poorly, or misjudged timing. What I’ve learned is that clarity doesn’t mean perfection—it means caring enough to keep trying. I can only hope that people remember my intent—that I was never perfect, but always trying to do what was right.

Some of my strongest moments as a leader came when I said, “I don’t know, but I’ll find out.” That simple phrase signaled two things: accountability and humility. It showed that I was confident enough to be uncertain—and that my clarity came from purpose, not ego.


Vulnerability: The Leadership Muscle Most PMs Overlook

Vulnerability isn’t softness—it’s discipline. It’s choosing honesty when it feels safer to posture. And in a creative, high-velocity industry like games, vulnerability builds the trust that makes clarity possible.

  • When you admit you don’t have all the answers, you create space for others to contribute.
  • When you acknowledge doubt, you model that uncertainty is part of innovation.
  • When you reveal intent behind a decision, you replace command with connection.

The more senior you get, the fewer people are willing to challenge you. Vulnerability invites them back in. In production or live ops reviews, admitting what’s unclear often surfaces the real blockers faster than pretending to have certainty.


Clarity and Vulnerability Are the Same Skill

Clarity and vulnerability aren’t opposites—they’re mirrors. One without the other collapses under pressure.

Misconception Truth
Clarity is about having answers. Clarity is about giving direction even when the answers aren’t known.
Vulnerability weakens authority. Vulnerability strengthens authority through trust.
Strong leaders eliminate doubt. Great leaders frame doubt so the team can act anyway.

Both clarity and vulnerability are rooted in self-trust. You can’t guide others through ambiguity if you secretly believe your own uncertainty disqualifies you.


How to Practice Self-Trust as a Leader

Trusting yourself isn’t about being infallible—it’s about knowing you’ll recover if you’re wrong.

Try reframing clarity as a practice of courage:

  • Name the uncertainty. “Here’s what we know, and here’s what we don’t.”
  • Share your reasoning, not just your decision. Context creates confidence.
  • Invite interpretation. “What are you seeing that I might be missing?”
  • Protect space for truth. Reward honesty, even when it’s inconvenient.

Leadership isn’t about removing risk—it’s about teaching your team how to move through it together.

In Building a Culture of Learning, I wrote about curiosity as the foundation for experimentation. The same mindset applies to leadership—when you stay curious instead of defensive, you build trust even amid uncertainty.


Closing Thought: The Trust That Matters Most

Over time, I’ve realized the hardest kind of trust isn’t between you and your team—it’s between you and yourself.

The best leaders I’ve worked with all share one thing in common: they trust their own judgment enough to be transparent about its limits. They don’t mistake vulnerability for weakness. They understand that clarity isn’t confidence—it’s conviction born from courage.

When you can trust yourself enough to be vulnerable, others will trust your clarity—and follow your lead.